Overview
Many cases are won or lost on evidence collected before a notice is even issued. We coordinate licensed investigators, forensic accountants and digital-evidence specialists to produce material that survives admissibility challenges in Indian courts.
All surveillance engagements are supervised by our advocates and conducted within the constitutional right to privacy framework articulated in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017). Our protocols include strict NDAs, chain-of-custody documentation, and Section 65B Evidence Act certification for all electronic evidence.
Mandates range from corporate fraud investigations and pre-employment due diligence to asset tracing for execution of decrees and matrimonial surveillance. Our cross-border investigation network covers UAE, UK, Singapore and the United States.
Investigation Mandates
- Corporate fraud, vendor kickbacks & employee malfeasance
- Pre-employment, pre-litigation & counter-party due diligence
- Matrimonial surveillance & adultery evidence (Section 65B Evidence Act compliant)
- Asset tracing for execution of decrees and arbitration awards
- Brand protection — counterfeit market mapping, parallel imports
- Insurance fraud investigation
Digital & Forensic Evidence
- Electronic discovery & Section 65B certification
- Forensic imaging of devices, e-mail and cloud storage
- OSINT — open-source intelligence on entities and individuals
- Social media evidence collection with timestamping
- Call data record (CDR) analysis through legal channels
Legal Admissibility Framework
All evidence collected is structured for direct presentation in court. Section 65B(4) certifications are prepared at the time of collection (not later — Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, Arjun Panditrao). Chain-of-custody logs are maintained for every device and document. We coordinate with handwriting experts, voice-print analysts and forensic auditors as required.
Cross-Border Investigations
For international elements — assets parked abroad, foreign domiciled directors, overseas counterparties — we coordinate through our investigator network in major financial centres. Letters of request under the CPC, mutual legal assistance treaties (MLATs), and Hague Convention service are leveraged where formal evidence is needed.
Statutes & Regulations
Key laws governing this practice.
Who This Is For
Audiences we typically advise in this area.
- Companies investigating internal fraud or vendor kickbacks
- Spouses gathering evidence in matrimonial disputes
- Decree-holders tracing judgment-debtor assets
- Brand owners mapping counterfeit networks
- Insurers contesting fraudulent claims
Recent Outcomes
Anonymised matter highlights.
₹6 cr Asset Tracing Closed in 90 Days
Decree-holder seeking execution against an evasive judgment-debtor. Asset trace identified bank accounts, immovable property and listed shares — execution recovered ~70% within 90 days.
Matrimonial Evidence Held Admissible
Section 65B(4) compliant electronic evidence including geo-tagged photographs and call data — fully accepted by Family Court at Patiala House.
Outcomes are matter-specific. Past results are not a guarantee of future performance.
Why K & K
Strategic differentiators in this practice.
- Investigations supervised by lawyers — admissibility built in.
- Strict NDA & chain-of-custody protocols.
- Cross-border tracing through international correspondent network.
- Forensic technology partners for high-volume electronic discovery.
Frequently Asked
Questions our clients ask first.
Serving Delhi NCR & Beyond
Our office at A-197, LGF, Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024 is the operating base for clients across Delhi NCR — Gurgaon, Noida, Faridabad, Ghaziabad — and pan-India through a vetted local-counsel network. We routinely appear at Saket, Patiala House, Tis Hazari, Karkardooma, Rohini and Dwarka District Courts; the Delhi High Court; and the Supreme Court of India.
Begin a Conversation